Digital Rocket
6 years  ·  115+ clients  ·  5 countries Start the check
For schools and training providers

Why your inquiries don’t enroll. And why the leads are bad.

Five systems sit between the ad click and a student on day one. This check grades all five, scores you out of 100 and names the leaks costing you the most.

Start the check →
Free  ·  About 4 minutes
System 1 of 5  ·  Tracking

Do you know what one enrolled student costs you to get?

Not cost per inquiry. The cost of a student who paid and showed up.

Choose one to begin ↓
Free  ·  About 4 minutes
3 of 5Checks most schools fail
20+Questions, it branches
4 minStart to score
$0To see your result
What the check looks at

Five valves between ad spend and a student on day one.

Spend enters on the left. Most of it never reaches the right. The check finds which valves are open, in the order they cost you.

$Spend in
01Tracking Can you trace one dollar to one enrolled student? Most leak here
02Qualification Does anything filter an inquiry before admissions does? Most leak here
03Admissions process Is enrolling a system, or one strong person? Usually holds
04Speed How long does a qualified inquiry wait for a human? Most leak here
05Quality at scale What happened to inquiry quality when budget rose? Usually holds
✓Enrolled

Most schools fail three of the five. The check tells you which three.

Find my three →
What you get back

A diagnosis, not a lead magnet.

Sample result  ·  your readiness score
44/ 100
The leads aren’t bad by accident.
Broken
Tracking
Broken
Qualification
Leaking
Admissions Process
Leaking
Speed and Follow-Up
Solid
Quality at Scale
Every row carries its own one line diagnosis. Example: "You’re deciding budget on estimates. Your cost per enrolled student can’t currently be trusted."
Part one  ·  On screen, in four minutes

Your score and the five system read.

A readiness score out of 100, then every system marked SOLID, LEAKING or BROKEN with the one line reason why. That is the panel on the left, filled in with your own answers.

Part two  ·  In your inbox, ready to forward

Your top three leaks, ranked by what they cost.

What each one costs at your own tuition, the math on the seats you said you need to fill, and the order to fix them in. Written to be forwarded to your co-director or your board.

Fix it yourself, hand it to your team, or hand it to the agency you already have. The list is the same list.

Cohorts sold out in advance on this exact fix order.

Elec Training, a UK electrician training provider, was paying £257 a lead and under-filling cohorts. We rebuilt intake in the same order this check uses, so the same budget bought roughly 48x the inquiries and scheduled cohorts sold out in advance. Client-reported, not estimated.

Training · Elec Training · UK
£5.28
Cost per lead, down from £257. A 98% reduction.
Elec Training · UK · Verified case · See case study
Return on ad spend · Client-reported
Held across 21 consecutive months myTTConline · Google + Bing
2.99x
Cost per lead · Verified
£257 to £5.28 on the same budget Elec Training · UK
98%
Video testimonial Charanjit, Elec Training
Charanjit Mannu · Director, Elec Training
UK electrician training provider. Cost per lead from £257 to £5.28, cohorts sold out in advance. See the case study
Before you start

Built for schools already enrolling.

You will get the most from it if
  • You enrolled students in the last 12 months
  • You pay for inquiries, or are about to
  • Someone on your side owns admissions
  • You would rather hear where it breaks than be sold to
If you have no students yet
  • The check will tell you so, plainly
  • You get the honest order to a first cohort instead
  • No pitch, no follow-up barrage

A five-figure decision needs proof: graduates, outcomes, names. With no students yet there is nothing for a prospect to check, and ads would only make you pay to learn that on their timeline. We would rather tell you that now than take your money for six months first.

Before you start

What school owners ask before they start.

Your readiness score out of 100 and the five-system read on screen, then the three reasons your inquiries do not enroll, ranked by what they cost at your tuition and seat goal, in your inbox with the order to fix them in. It is the same list whether you fix it yourself, hand it to admissions, or hand it to the agency you already have.
No. Several questions ask whether you know a number, not what it is, because not knowing what one enrolled student costs you is itself a result. If you do know your monthly recruitment spend, inquiries a month and how many students enrolled in the last twelve months, keep them close: the breakdown can then put figures on each leak instead of ranges.
No. The result is a diagnosis, on screen and in your inbox, and nothing in it asks you to buy. If it shows a fit and you want the numbers walked through, the email tells you how to book a review. If it shows you are early, it says so and gives you the order to build first instead.
Yes, and expect a different kind of result. A five-figure decision needs proof: graduates, outcomes, names. With no students yet there is nothing for a prospect to check, so the check will say plainly that paid recruitment is early and give you the honest order to a first cohort instead of a pitch.
The check

Four minutes for an honest answer.

You will know which of the five systems is costing you the most, what it costs at your numbers, and what to fix first.

Start the check →
Free  ·  About 4 minutes
Find profit leaks